When should an assistant refuse, escalate, or continue with restrictions?

Instruction: Explain how you decide among refusal, restricted continuation, and escalation.

Context: Choosing refusal, escalation, or a permitted restricted path.

Updated

Example Answer

I’d decide from the request, the user’s permissions, and the consequences of the action. If the request is prohibited, I’d refuse that part and offer a permitted alternative. If it might be allowed but needs authorization or specialist judgment, I’d pause and send it to the right reviewer. If I can safely complete a smaller part, I’d do that with the limit made clear. For example, I could draft a refund explanation, but issuing the refund would still require the account checks and approval the business expects. A confident model response would not change those requirements.

Concrete example

Keep the drafted explanation separate from the actual refund operation. Record whether the request is prohibited, awaiting review, or allowed within a defined scope.

Limit to explain

Escalation is not permission to proceed while waiting. The execution layer must keep the restricted action blocked, and approval must stay within the reviewed scope.

Follow-up to practice

What should happen when no authorized reviewer is available?

Your preparation path

Work through these questions in order. Read the answer aloud, then explain it in your own words.

Related Questions