The agent completes the code change and misses migration or rollout implications. How would you catch that?

Instruction: Describe how you would surface non-code implications of a code change.

Context: Tests how the candidate diagnoses the problem, chooses the safest next step, and reasons through recovery. Describe how you would surface non-code implications of a code change.

Official answer available

Preview the opening of the answer, then unlock the full walkthrough.

I would add explicit checks for operational implications as part of the workflow. If the task touches schemas, configs, interfaces, or behavior with deployment impact, the agent should be required to inspect migrations, docs, rollout notes, or ownership cues before declaring the change done.

I...

Upgrade to view official answer

Related Questions