Your approval flow blocks too many harmless tool calls and users stop trusting the assistant. What would you redesign?
Instruction: Describe how you would rebalance approvals when they are too broad.
Context: Tests how the candidate diagnoses the problem, chooses the safest next step, and reasons through recovery. Describe how you would rebalance approvals when they are too broad.
Updated
Official answer available
Read the opening below, then unlock the full answer and practical guidance.
I'd review denied and abandoned calls by actual action risk. A permitted document lookup may need no extra approval, while sending that document externally crosses a disclosure boundary even though both operations look routine...
Your preparation path
Work through these questions in order. Read the answer aloud, then explain it in your own words.
1. Start with the foundations
Build the vocabulary and explain the core decisions.
2. Apply it to a real workflow
Practice diagnosis, validation, and everyday tradeoffs.
3. Prepare for senior discussions
Explain failure boundaries, recovery, and production choices.
- Design a fallback strategy when tools are unavailable, degraded, or unauthorized. Member answer
- How do you implement MCP step-up authorization without losing scopes or retrying forever? Member answer
- An MCP request resumes after user confirmation. How would you validate its requestState? Member answer
Related Questions
-
easy
-
easy
-
easy
-
easy
-
easy
-
easy