Instruction: Discuss how you would set up an observational study to evaluate whether implementing flexible work hours causally affects team productivity. Include methods to address potential confounders.
Context: This question assesses the candidate's ability to handle complexities in causal inference when randomized controlled trials are not feasible. The candidate should demonstrate understanding of techniques to control for confounding variables and propose a methodologically sound approach to estimate the real causal effect of flexible work hours on productivity.
Official answer available
Preview the opening of the answer, then unlock the full walkthrough.
To start, it's essential to clearly define the primary outcome of interest: team productivity. This could be quantified using various metrics, such as the completion rate of tasks, the quality of work produced, or more directly, the output measured against pre-set goals. For simplicity, let's consider productivity as the average completion rate of assigned tasks per team member per week. This metric encapsulates both the efficiency and speed of task completion.
Given the observational nature of the study, we cannot randomly assign teams to flexible or fixed working hours, which inherently introduces potential confounders. These could range from the nature of work (more creative tasks might naturally align better with flexible schedules) to team composition (teams with more experienced members might inherently...