A human reviewer approves almost every step, turning the agent into a slow workflow. What would you redesign?

Instruction: Explain how you would keep human review useful without making the system unusably slow.

Context: Tests how the candidate diagnoses the problem, chooses the safest next step, and reasons through recovery. Explain how you would keep human review useful without making the system unusably slow.

Updated

Official answer available

Read the opening below, then unlock the full answer and practical guidance.

I would redesign the approval policy around risk, not around habit. If reviewers are approving nearly everything, the system is probably asking for human input too often or at the wrong granularity.

I would group low-risk actions into broader approval...

Your preparation path

Work through these questions in order. Read the answer aloud, then explain it in your own words.

Related Questions